Peer Review Policy

To ensure publication quality, IJLJSA follows a structured double-blind peer review process.

Review Stages:

1. Initial Screening:

   • Scope check

   • Formatting

   • Plagiarism assessment

2. Double-Blind Peer Review:

   • Minimum of two expert reviewers

   • Evaluation based on originality, relevance, doctrinal soundness, analytical depth, policy relevance, and clarity

3. Editorial Decision:

   • Accept

   • Minor Revision

   • Major Revision

   • Reject

Review Timeline

• Typically completed within 2–4 weeks

Reviewer Guidelines:

• Maintain confidentiality

• Provide unbiased, constructive feedback

• Declare conflicts of interest

• Report ethical irregularities