Peer Review Policy
Stages:
-
Initial Screening
-
Manuscript format check, plagiarism screening, and evaluation of relevance to cyber operations, cybersecurity governance, and international cyber law.
-
-
Double-Blind Peer Review
-
At least two independent reviewers evaluate the manuscript anonymously for originality, scholarly quality, legal accuracy, methodology, relevance, and contribution to the field.
-
-
Decision Phase
-
Accept / Minor Revision / Major Revision / Reject
-
Review Time:
-
Average: 2–4 weeks
Reviewer Responsibilities:
-
Maintain strict confidentiality throughout the review process.
-
Provide constructive, objective, and unbiased feedback.
-
Evaluate the originality, relevance, methodology, and academic quality of the manuscript.
-
Identify ethical concerns, plagiarism, research integrity issues, or potential conflicts of interest.
-
Assess the manuscript's contribution to international cyber law, cyber operations, cybersecurity governance, cyber policy, and emerging digital security research.