Peer Review Policy

Stages

  1. Initial Screening
    • Manuscript format and completeness check
    • Plagiarism and originality check
    • Evaluation of the manuscript's relevance to the journal's scope
  2. Double-Blind Peer Review
    • Manuscripts are evaluated anonymously by at least two independent reviewers
    • Reviewers assess the manuscript's originality, academic quality, methodology, relevance, and contribution to the field
  3. Editorial Decision
    • Accept
    • Minor Revision
    • Major Revision
    • Reject

Review Time

  • Average review period: 2–4 weeks
  • The review duration may vary depending on reviewer availability and manuscript complexity.

Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

  • Maintain strict confidentiality of submitted manuscripts
  • Provide constructive, objective, and unbiased feedback
  • Evaluate the originality, academic quality, and relevance of the manuscript
  • Identify potential ethical concerns, conflicts of interest, or plagiarism
  • Avoid using unpublished information from submitted manuscripts for personal or professional advantage
  • Recommend revisions where necessary to improve the quality and clarity of the manuscript